Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teddlie, C.
Right arrow Articles by Oescher, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Masking of the Delivery of Educational Services to Lower-Achieving Students

Charles Teddlie

Louisiana State University

Michael H. Lang

The Psychological Corporation

Jeffrey Oescher

University of New Orleans

A long-term concern of school-effectiveness researchers has been the delivery of educational services to lower-achieving students, who often live in urban areas and come from minority or other socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. The concern has been that to look only at average (mean) achievement in a school might "mask" the ineffective delivery of services to students in traditionally lower-achieving groups. This research on school effectiveness looks at the delivery of services both to the entire school population (measured by the mean score) and to those students who scored below the median (measured by the lower quartile score). Results indicated that mean masking occurred in about 17% of the schools. However, masking occurred more often when schools were doing an average job of educating everyone and an above-average job of educating the lower quartile. Implications for school indicator systems (including recognition and incentive programs) are discussed.

Urban Education, Vol. 30, No. 2, 125-149 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0042085995030002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?