This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Manouchehri, A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Implementing Mathematics Reform in Urban Schools

A Study of the Effect of Teachers’ Motivation Style

Central Michigan University

The purpose of this study was twofold. First, it aimed to determine whether the teachers’ choice of motivation style influenced their mathematics teaching. Second, it investigated the influence of teachers’ choice of motivation style on their willingness and ability to implement reform-based mathematics curriculum and instruction. Eight high school mathematics teachers fromthe two groups of autonomysupportive and controlling style of motivation were observed over the course of 5 months as they implemented a reform-based unit of instruction in geometry. All teachers worked in an urban school district. There were significant differences between the two groups of teachers relative to how they taught mathematics and interacted with students. Autonomy-supportive teachers’ behaviors were more compatible with current reform recommendations for mathematics teaching. Moreover, autonomy-supportive teachers were more willing to teach and more successful in implementing the reform-based unit of instruction in geometry. All teachers experienced difficulty creating a student-centered mathematics classroom.

Key Words: mathematics education • educational reform • secondary school teaching • motivation style

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?