|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Narrowing of Curriculum and Pedagogy in the Age of Accountability Urban Educators Speak Out
Margaret S. Crocco
Columbia University
Arthur T. Costigan
Queens College, CUNY
Under the curricular and pedagogical impositions of scripted lessons and mandated curriculum, patterns associated nationwide with high-stakes testing, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and the phenomenon known as the "narrowing of curriculum," new teachers in New York City (NYC) find their personal and professional identity thwarted, creativity and autonomy undermined, and ability to forge relationships with students diminished—all critical factors in their expressed job satisfaction. These indirect consequences of accountability regimen as it operates in NYC may exacerbate new teacher attrition, especially from schools serving low-income students. The data reported here suggest a mixed picture of frustration and anger, alongside determination, resistance, and resilience in the face of these impositions. Responses vary by school and grade level, lending support to the notion that the organizational environment serves as a critical factor in teachers' early career decisions about staying or leaving a school or the profession.
Key Words: curriculum narrowing • teacher attrition • NCLB
References
- Achinstein, B., Ogawa, R.T., & Speiglman, A. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 557-603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Alder, N. (2002). Interpretations of the meaning of care: Creating caring relationships in urban middle school classrooms. Urban Education, 37, 241-266.
- Boardman, A.G., & Woodruff, A.L. (2004). Teacher change and "high stakes" assessment: What happens to professional development? Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 545-557.[CrossRef]
- Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (1992). Foundations of qualitative research in education: An introduction. In Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd. ed., pp. 1-57). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Boote, D.N. (2006). Teachers' professional discretion and the curricula. Teachers and teaching, 12, 461-478.[CrossRef]
- Boyd, D.J., Grossman, P., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Michelli, N., & Wyckoff, J. (2006). Complex by design: Investigating pathways into teaching in New York City schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 155-166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Clandinin, D.J., & Connelly, F.M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories—stories of teachers—school stories—stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24-30.[Free Full Text]
- Clark, C. M. (Ed.). (2001). Talking shop. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Stayers, lovers, and dreamers: Insights about teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 387-392.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Costigan, A. (2004). Finding a name for what they want: A study of New York City's teaching fellows. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 129-143.[CrossRef]
- Costigan, A. (2005). A "traditional" alternative route to certification: Narrative research and implications for teacher education and teacher retention. Association of Teacher Educators Yearbook, XIII, 27-38.
- Costigan, A.T., & Crocco, M.S. (2004). Learning to teach in an age of accountability. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Crocco, M.S., & Costigan, A. (2006). High-stakes teaching: What's at stake for teachers (and students) in the age of accountability. The New Educator, 2, 1-13.
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2005). Educating the new educator: Teacher education and the future of democracy. The New Educator, 1, 1-18.
- Department of Education, New York City. (2004). Balanced literacy. New York: Author. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from www.nycenet.edu/Offices/TeachLearn/OfficeCurriculumProfessionalDevelopment/DepartmentofLiteracy/BalancedLiteracy/default.htm.com
- Dillon, S. (2006, March 26). Schools cut back subjects to push reading and math. The New York Times, p. 1.
- Elmore, R., & Sykes, G. (1992). Curriculum policy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), The handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 185-215). New York: Macmillan.
- Ely, M., Anzul, M., Freidman, T., Garner, D., & Steinmetz, A.M. (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London: Falmer.
- Fried, R. (2005). The game of school: Why we all play; How it hurts learning; What to do to change it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Fuhrman, S.H. (1999). The new accountability (Research Brief No. 27). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
- Grant, S.G. (2000). Teachers and tests: Exploring teachers' perceptions of changes in the New York State testing program. Educational Policy Analysis Archives 8(14). Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n14.html
- Grant, S.G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in US high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hammerness, K. (2003). Learning to hope, or hoping to learn? The role of vision in the early professional lives of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 43-56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hansen, D.T. (1994). Teaching and the sense of vocation. Educational Theory, 44, 259-275.[CrossRef]
- Harris, J. (2004). Online support for teacher induction. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education Briefs, 25(12), 5-6.
- Herszenhorn, D. (2005, May 10). Most city 8th graders miss state norm in social studies. The New York Times, B8.
- Huberman, M. (1993). The lives of teachers. (J. Neufeld, Trans.). New York: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1989)
- Huling-Austin, L. (1992). Research on learning to teach: Implications for teacher induction and mentoring programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 173-80.[Abstract]
- Ingersoll, R.M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86, 16-31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ingersoll, R.M. (2003a). Is there really a teacher shortage? A report co-sponsored by the Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and the Center for Policy Research in Education. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Retrieved August 21, 2005, from http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty_research/Shortage-RMI-09-2003.pdf
- Ingersoll, R.M. (2003b). Who controls teachers' work? Power and accountability in America's schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Ingersoll, R.M., & Smith, T.M. (2003). The wrong solution to the teacher shortage. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 30-33.
- Jerald, C.D. (2006). The hidden costs of curriculum narrowing. Issue brief. Washington, DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
- Johnson, S.M., Kardos, S.M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donaldson, M.L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers' early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61). Retrieved June 5, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n61/
- Johnson, S.M., & The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Kardos, S.M., & Johnson, S.M. (2007). On their own and presumed expert: New teachers' experience with their colleagues. Teachers College Record 109(9). Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12812
- Kauffman, D., Johnson, S.M., Kardos, S.M., Liu, E., & Peske, H.G. (2002, March 2). "Lost at sea": New teachers' experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 273-300.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Koustelios, A., Karabatzaki, D., & Kouisteliou, I. (2004). Autonomy and job satisfaction for a sample of Greek teachers. Psychological Reports, 95, 883-886.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Levin, B.B. (2003). Case studies of teacher development: An in-depth look at how thinking about pedagogy develops over time. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Louis, K.S., Kruse, S.D., & Marks, H.M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. M. Newmann & Associates (Eds.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Manzo, K.K. (2005, March 16). Social studies losing out to reading, math. Education Week, pp. 1, 16, 17, 24, 25.
- Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (2003, September 24). Constraining elementary teachers' work: Dilemmas and paradoxes created by state mandated testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(34). Retrieved July 11, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n34/
- MetLife. (2005). Transitions and the role of supportive relations: A survey of teachers, principals and students. Harris Interactive. Retrieved August 26, 2007, from http://www.metlife.com/WPSAssets/16176418591118756128V1FATS_2004.pdf
- Michelli, N. (2005). The politics of teacher education: Lessons from New York City. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 235-241.[CrossRef]
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). What matters most: Teaching and America's future. Washington, DC: Author.
- National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children. Washington, DC: Author.
- National Council on Teacher Quality. (2004 ). Increasing the odds: How good policies can yield better teachers. Washington, DC: Author.
- Newmann, F.M., & Wehlage, G.G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the center on organization and restructuring of schools. Madison: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
- New Teacher Center at the University of California, Santa Cruz. (2006). Understanding New York City's groundbreaking induction initiative: Policy implications for local, state, and national education leaders. Santa Cruz, California: Author.
- Ogawa, R.T., Sandholtz, J.H., Martina-Flores, M., & Scribner, S.P. (2003). The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district's standards-based curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 147-176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pease-Alvarez, L., & Samway, K. (2005, April). Resisting or adapting: Where do you draw the line? Practicing teachers grappling with literacy reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
- Quartz, K.H., Lyons, K.B., Masyn, K., Olsen, B., Anderson, L., Thomas, A., et al. (2004). Retention in high poverty schools: A research brief. Los Angeles: UCLA/ IDEA.
- Quartz, K.H., Lyons, K.B., & Thomas, A. (2004). Retaining teachers in high poverty schools: A policy framework. Los Angeles: UCLA/IDEA.
- Ravitch, D., & Viteritti, J.P. (2000). City schools: Lessons from New York. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Rex, L.A., & Nelson, M. (2004). How teachers professional identities position high-stakes test preparation in their classrooms. Teachers College Record, 106, 1288-1331.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Richer, S., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. (1992). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2089-2113.[CrossRef]
- Riehl, C., & Sipple, J.W. (1996). Making the most of time and talent: Secondary school organizational climates, teaching task environments, and teacher commitment. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 873-901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ross, C., & Reskin, B. (1992). Education, control at work, and job satisfaction. Social Science Research, 21, 134-148.[CrossRef]
- Sergiovanni, T.J., & Moore, J.H. (1985). Schooling for tomorrow. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Spillane, J.P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 143-175.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Sutton, R.E. (2004). Teaching under high-stakes testing: Dilemmas and decisions of a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 463-75.[Abstract]
- Talbert, J., & Ennis, M. (1990, April). Teacher tracking: Exacerbating inequalities in the high school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
- Thornton, S.J. (1991). Teachers as curriculum instructional gatekeepers. In J. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research in social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-249). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- U.S. Congress. (2001). No child left behind act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
- von Zastrow, C., & Jane, H. (2004). Academic atrophy: The condition of the liberal arts in America's public schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
- Watlington, E., Shockley, R., Earley, D.L., Huie, K.K., Morris, J.D., & Lieberman, M. (2004, Summer). Variables associated with teacher retention: A multi-year study. The Teacher Educator, 40(1), 56-66.
- Wise, A.E., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1983). Beyond standardization: State standards and school improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED245353)
Urban Education, Vol. 42, No. 6,
512-535 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0042085907304964
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
N. S. Anderson and C. L. Larson
"Sinking, Like Quicksand": Expanding Educational Opportunity for Young Men of Color
Educational Administration Quarterly,
February 1, 2009;
45(1):
71 - 114.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
